Sunday 30 November 2014
A Mystery Inside An Enigma. 'The Imitation Game'.
Benedict Cumberbatch has pretty much cornered the market in playing arrogant anti-social geniuses so it is no surprise to find him here playing arrogant anti-social genius Alan Turing. What is a surprise is that "Cumberbatch fatigue" hasn't set in and that he still has enough weaponry in his acting arsenal to find new levels of sensitivity and subtlety and manages a performance that makes you forget all about Sherlock. Keira Knightley, Mark Strong and Charles Dance are all great too.
It's an excellent film and uncommonly entertaining considering that this could so easily have become a talky, worthy bore. There's a fractured narrative, lots of spy-story intrigue and plenty of thematic strands to follow but it all works. It never becomes convoluted and never loses sight of the emotional pull or the human tragedy. Yes, yes it's about cracking impossible cryptic codes but it's also about trying to crack social codes and it's about us trying to decypher the man, understand the sacrifices made and realign our perspective of the war. The story of Turing and Bletchley Park deserves to be as well known as 'The Dam Busters' but it is right that the social condemnation he suffered and the secrecy surrounding his achievements is given equal gravitas.
The title 'The Imitation Game' refers to the paper on machine intelligence that established Turing's name academically but as the film goes on it becomes clear that this is a wonderfully multi-layered title that feeds into all the key themes. It's clever, but it's not clever-clever. If anything the worst parts of the film are the scenes where the life lessons are overemphasised. When the line - "Sometimes it is the people no one imagines anything of who do the things that no one can imagine" you can almost see the highlighter pen underneath it and there are some preposterously cinematic "Eureka!" moments, but not to worry, I'd rather it went for the mass audience over the art house crowd.
It's not a thriller but it is thrilling and a film you should see.
Saturday 15 November 2014
Dook! Dook! Dook! The Babadook.
I finally caught up with 'The Babadook' this week, just before it disappears from cinemas, and I'm glad I did because it is almost certainly the best horror film of 2014. If it even is a horror film. The emphasis is on psychological unease rather than formulaic jump scares and it's reminiscent of films in the vein of 'Repulsion', 'Spider' and 'We Need To Talk About Kevin'. It's not a monster movie. It's a "monsters of the mind" movie.
In an Australian suburb a single mother struggles with her grief several years after losing her husband in a car accident that happened as they drove to the hospital to give birth. The boy who was born on the same day as Amelia's husband died is now a 'difficult' six year old with a vivid imagination, an arsenal of home made weaponry and all manner of behavioural problems. All the sympathy and support seems to be drying up. The school authorities are getting serious, Amelia's sister is distancing herself and her employer is losing patience. All of these problems compound the feelings of grief and resentment. And now there is this pop-up book - 'Mister Babadook' that seems to be foreshadowing other horrors to come. The monster is waiting outside this unhappy house. Dook! Dook! Dook! Can you hear him knocking?
If you look at any of those Top Ten horror film lists you'll see 'The Exorcist', 'Halloween', 'Rosemary's Baby', 'The Shining', 'Let The Right One In', 'The Omen' , 'Carrie', 'Don't Look Now' and 'A Nightmare On Elm Street' as perennial choices. They are all to a larger or lesser extent about our fear of children or fear for children. 'The Babadook' has nods to all of them and is worthy of joining the canon. This is not a reheating of hackneyed themes but an intelligent progression and exploration of the genre.
It's an accomplished debut film from Jennifer Kent. The framing and pacing of the film recall the early work of that other Antipodean director - Jane Campion but it definitely has a distinct flavour of its own. An American or European take on this material would probably have turned out quite ordinary. This is also one of the best edited horror films that I've seen in a long while. It has a slow burn set up but it never drags its feet. Scenes seem to last exactly as long as they need to and the audience is trusted to fill in the gaps. What a joy it is to see stop-motion and in-camera effects rather than the usual barrage of CGI imagery. There are even sequences inspired by film pioneer Georges Méliès and German expressionism. It's the perfect antidote to stupid fucking creepy doll movies and quiet, quiet, bang! scares.
Essie Davis and Noah Wiseman are fabulous as mother and son. Horror films are normally derailed by actors not being up to the job if the role calls for something beyond screaming and looking worried. Your sympathies and viewpoints will shift a lot with these characters; these performances keep them as believable people you really care about.
Is it scary though? Well, yes....and no. This is always a problem. What's 'scary' differs from person to person. I would say that 'The Babadook' is more "unsettling" than "scary", but then again I don't particularly find 'The Shining' "scary" even though I admire it. This film certainly wrong-footed the audience I saw it with, who thought they were going to see another 'Annabelle', but then couldn't quite figure out where to scream and giggle. The intention is not to provide a rollercoaster ride of jump scares or create a new "Freddy' or 'Jason'. Instead, this is a subtle and powerful impression of a mind unravelling itself in the face of domestic horrors and the gentle drift into mental illness.
'The Babadook' embraces everything good about the horror genre, draws on the best material within that genre and reshapes it into new and unnerving shapes. It's ambitious and distinguished and exciting. It also has a great ending that doesn't need a big stupid twist or apocalyptic destruction to make it work. It's small-scale but epic in its implications.
'Annabelle' felt like the nadir of modern horror. 'The Babadook' feels like a good place to start again. Let's hope it is. After all, you can't get rid of the Babadook.
Dook! Dook! Dook!
Wednesday 12 November 2014
"My God, It's Full Of Stars!".....And Tears. 'Interstellar'.
I hate Christopher Nolan 'cause he made me cry.
crying
crying
touchy feely
trying not to cry
crying
drowning in tears
some space stuff
crying again
I don't do crying at the movies. I'm far too aware of how I'm being manipulated to let that happen. I've sat stoney faced through 'Titanic' and others. But 'Interstellar' really got to me - on a deep level that I can't quite fathom. It made me cry. Bastard!
And I don't just mean 'cry' as in wiping a tear away from my cheek at the end of the movie. No, I mean welling up a third of the way into the film and then pretty much not being able to stop. I mean, bawling like a baby crying. Bastard! Bastard, bastard film!
Maybe it was because I was a bit ill with a bad cold. Maybe I had an allergic reaction in the cinema. Maybe it's because 'Interstellar' is a harrowing, emotional powerhouse that doesn't let up and resonates on intensely personal and epic levels. Maybe it's because it's about love transcending everything. Maybe it's because it's the best film of 2014 and I'm not even remotely a Nolan fanboy. Maybe it's because it's a masterpiece and we've forgotten what they look like. Whatever. It's a bastard. An incredible, beautiful, unforgettable bastard,
And to think I thought it was going to be shit because the trailer looked boring.
Bastard.
Q: So what is 'Interstellar' about?
A: It's about three hours long and makes you cry for about one of them. Even during the action scenes. Bastard.
Q: Is it as good as '2001'?
A: Did Kubrick make you cry? Well, did he? No, he didn't.
Q: Is the story any good?
A: I dunno, what do you want? Exploring our place in the universe, reaching out to save ourselves, making the ultimate sacrifice, crossing the boundaries of space and time, the minuscule made epic and the epic made minuscule. It hasn't got giant robots hitting each other if that's what you're asking. Or space lizards. Or Batman. It has got crying.
Q: I heard it's full of plot holes and bad science. Is that true?
A: It's science fiction, you dullard! You might as well pick fault with the stars. Or tears.
Q: Should I see it in on an Imax screen?
A: Just how big do you want Matthew McConaughey's tears to be? Look, just go and see it. It's bold, it's ambitious and original. It's cinema at it's best. On one level it is a film about cinema, about Nolan pushing the form a little bit further. Just don't watch it on your mobile phone.
Q: What's the big twist?
A: It's a poem about humanity. That's the big twist. No gimmicks, no logic puzzles. Humanity.
Q: My friend says its "meh". My friend says it's not as good as 'The Dark Knight'. My friend says it's not Christopher Nolan's best film. What do you say to that?
A: Your friend is a fucking idiot.
Q: Is it sentimental?
A: Yes, but it's sincere and it's not trite.
Q: What else can you tell me about it?
A: Nothing. I don't want to. Just go and see it for yourself.
Q: Will I cry?
A: Probably. Yes. Unless you only want space battles.
Interstellar. It's not flawless but it is perfect. And it made me cry.
Bastard.
Dysfunctional Family. 'This Is Where I Leave You'.
Despite being an only child I have a penchant for movies about fighting siblings. Any film that features a strong ensemble cast, a confined social situation and well written dialogue will usually work but they are rare beats these days and so it was a delight to watch 'This Is Where I Leave You' as it is a proper movie for grown ups; strong on comedy and strong on drama without the need to pretend its a rom-com or high art.
It is what it is - a film about a dysfunctional family trying to get through testing times. It has enough wit and insight and warmth to make it worth your while and whilst it won't be on anyone's end of year best of list it's definitely worth catching it if you can.
When the patriarch of this dysfunctional family dies the four siblings are forced to spend a whole week together under one roof with their mother and various spouses, exes and ghosts from the past. It's reminiscent of 'The Big Chill' and 'Peter's Friends' and is as good as either of them. It's got a great script and a cast that know how to make it work. What's not to like? Plus you get a great turn from Jane Fonda, a showcase for Jason Bateman at his best and the always reliable Tina Fey. Quite how the director of 'Real Steel' (the boxing robots movie) managed to pull this off is a mystery but he has and this is a fun movie to stumble across.
The Woman Who Fell To Earth. 'Under The Skin'.
I finally caught up with 'Under The Skin' recently and I still don't know what to make of it. It's an odd film because it's everything that it's not.
It's an intimate indie film, set in Glasgow and the surrounding highlands, largely shot on hidden cameras - but it has the budget to match its ambitions, a gloss finish, Scarlett Johansson and state of the art SFX.
It's about a super sexy serial killing alien....without any genre trappings whatsoever. Imagine a Ken Loach version of 'Species'. Imagine David Cronenberg doing 'Local Hero'.
It is deliberately ambiguous, defiantly arty and admirably ambitious....but it also feels slight, self important and empty.
It's flamboyant and naturalistic; visually stunning in a way that does and doesn't call attention to itself. Fascinating but simultaneously repetitive and static.
It has moments of greatness; the beach scene would have made a stunning short film in itself. There are also plenty of mundane moments that just make you wonder if the filmmaker's had a proper grasp on the material.
It's a sensual experience rather than a narrative one, which is fine in itself.... but the trouble is that it's disturbing, erotic and freaky...without ever really getting...well....under the skin.
In short it's too arty for mainstream audiences and probably not challenging enough for the art house crowd. There's plenty of room for debate, reflection and interpretation but for me it felt like a sandwich when I wanted a full meal. What does it mean to be human? Can we ever really know another person? Identity. Sexual politics. Objectification. The filling is all there but there's no bread to hold it all together. I guess it's all about seeing ourselves through alien eyes. In which case I will probably stick with 'The Man Who Fell To Earth' as the main course when I want an 'exotic alien takes on humanoid form and trippy shit happens' movie.
Definitely worth seeing and whilst maybe not as compelling or as challenging as you might want it to be it's a striking piece of work.
A mixed bag of contradictions then - just like humanity itself.
Sunday 2 November 2014
Five Years. Is that all we've got? Superhero movie reviews 2015-2020
Does it feel like Marvel and DC own your lives until 2020?
Does it feel like you are a non person unless you are kept in a fever pitch of adolescent excitement by relentless marketing campaigns?
Does it feel like the death of cinema?
Here's my predictions for the next five years....
2015:
May 1: Avengers: Age of Ultron
....it's alright....
July 17: Ant-Man
....alright....but not as good as Avengers: Age of Ultron
August 7: Fantastic Four
....a missed opportunity (again!)....
2016:
February 12: Deadpool
....a man with a gun...who really gives a shit?....
March 25: Batman V Superman
...Did anyone really expect this to be good?
May 6: Captain America: Civil War
...The Empire Strikes Back of Marvel films.....
May 27: X-Men: Apocalypse
....the exact point where superhero fatigue sets in...
August 5: Suicide Squad
....slit your wrists time....
November 4: Doctor Strange
..trippy hippy nonsense....but worth seeing just for Cumberbatch exclaiming: "By the hoary hosts of Hogarth!"
November 11: Sinister Six
...oh, good God, make it stop....
2017:
March 3: Untitled Wolverine sequel
....Doesn't Hugh Jackman look really old....
May 5: Guardians of the Galaxy 2
....'Copacabana' and 'Disco Duck' are on the soundtrack...
June 23: Wonder Woman
....phwoar!!.....
July 14: Fantastic Four 2
....four!....
July 28: Thor: Ragnarok
...Thor!...
November 3: Black Panther
....bore!.....
November 17: Justice League, Part 1
....chore!....
(unspecified tentative date): Venom: Carnage Spider-Man spin-off
...gore!...
(unspecified date): Untitled female Spider-Man spin-off
...itsy bitsy spider...
2018:
March 23: The Flash
....the flush more like...
May 4: Avengers: Infinity War, Part 1
....the post end credits scene is a classic...
July 6: Captain Marvel
...WTF did I just watch?....
July 13: Untitled Fox Mystery Marvel film
..finally, the Devil Dinosaur gets his own movie ...
July 27: Aquaman
...there are only two things in this world that smell of fish.....
November 2: Inhumans
...wanted for crimes against inhumanity....
(unspecified date): Amazing Spider-Man 3
....stop getting Spider-Man wrong!...
2019:
April 5: Shazam
....Billy don't be a hero!...
May 3: Avengers: Infinity War, Part 2
... anti-climax...
June 14: Justice League, Part 2
...sets up exciting possibilities for part 3.....yawn....
2020:
April 3: Cyborg
...the six dollar man....
June 19: Green Lantern
....lights on, nobody home....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)